Posts Tagged ‘law & taxes’

The Copyright Act

Posted by John Sommers on 6th June 2017 in General

Generally the property is subject to an absolute protection in accordance with 903 BGB. Drew Houston is actively involved in the matter. The intellectual property is also protected, but not comprehensive, but only partially. Among the most important laws of protection: patent utility models industrial designs trademarks Act Copyright Act patents for inventions in all fields of technology issued, provided that they are new, based on an inventive step and are susceptible of industrial application. Inventions which are new, involve an inventive step and are susceptible of industrial application are protected as utility models. A pattern will be protected as designs, is new and has individual character. Essentially, it expects for designs to two-dimensional or three-dimensional appearance formulas of the whole product or part. Product is any industrial or handicraft production, including packaging, equipment, graphic symbols and typographic characters, etc.

The trade marks Act protects brands and other distinguishing marks be protected under this law: trademarks Copyright law protects works, and first of all works of art business geographic indications of origin. Meanwhile the copyright but has been, expanded essential last through the inclusion of computer programs. The protection of works of art has in recent decades increasingly a protection for investments become quite essential for the understanding of the law is that the law protects the copyright and not the exploiters of copyright exploitation rights. There is for example in legal transactions between exploiters and copyright on contractual agreements, so this will be always the copyright for the benefit in case of doubt. Protected works are derelict works, literary works, works of music, compositions, notes, works of art, including works of architecture and applied art, photographic works including works similarly, etc. created such as photographic works The list is not exhaustive, it should only outline what is at stake in the copyright law at all. You should ask for this purpose have or you be been subordinated to a copyright infringement or you want to remove this, send us an email: or call us.


Posted by John Sommers on 13th February 2017 in General

Press release of Consulting GmbH from October 29, 2009 just febs the new edition of the standard tax treatment of pension funds “now fifth edition published by insurance industry appeared. Orders are possible via the Publisher under. The authors Manfred Baier and Andreas Butler, both of febs Consulting GmbH, Managing Director have completely updated the work. To accommodate the ships to importance of sweeping doped U checkout, was the corresponding chapter expanded and febs supply Fund e. V.

with specific examples of numbers. The lump-sum prize money U cash can be of interest to companies, who want no investment in traditional insurance products”stresses Andreas Buttler. The febs chief warns of but at the same time the variety of less serious”providers that this execution path too sugarcoat your customers. Unfortunately, the book is not up to date on the issue of the portability of back covered U funds. Because the current circular from the 09.09.2009 could no longer be management. In early September the Finance Ministry failed unfortunately the tax begleitung the long-awaited coverage capital transfer agreement for U funds. In our current seminars U checkout we envision the parTICipants but alternatives, as the entering of the insurance but can be used to in practice”promises Manfred Baier.

The febs Academy where this topic is discussed, these are the dates on 06.11.2009 (U Fund), and on the 24th / 25.11.2009 (F II). Seminars for more information at. Of course, also the Besonderheiten U checkout in the pension rights adjustment are discussed in these seminars. “By the way: each seminar participant of the seminar Ruckgedeckte U checkout” will receive a free copy of the new book. Contact person: febs Consulting GmbH Andreas Buttler CEO in the high field 3 85630 Grasbrunn/Munchen Tel. 089 / 890 42 86-10 Web: mailto:


Posted by John Sommers on 23rd August 2016 in General

“For cosmetics is happy with statements as dermatologically recommended” or recommended by dermatologists “advertised. When using such claims caution is advised, but since these courts often as anti-competitive, because misleading are judged. In a recent decision of the Oberlandesgericht (OLG) Dusseldorf. “” In the case was recruited for a hair dye among other things with the statements: recommended by independent Dermatologists ‘and recommended by dermatologists’. The OLG Dusseldorf held regardless of the nature, the content and number of this dermatological opinion misleading these claims.

That statement was so understanding that dermatologists generally recommend the use of the advertised product. A significant portion of consumers in particular will this understand then, that in the opinion of any dermatologist the product no damage more evokes on skin and hair, the product so par excellence, dermatologically recommended in every respect. Since it is in cosmetics to such products were not from medical, but would apply for aesthetic reasons, evokes the impression that a so advertised cosmetics from medical point of view without risks can be applied and caused no damage to the advertising with a doctor’s recommendation. This impression of a schadigungs – and totally risk-free application is not applicable however due to the damage of the hair associated with the dye and therefore misleading. The decision of the OLG Dusseldorf shows that cosmetic products is offered in care when they should be advertised with medical recommendations. It shows that such claims as the advertising of cosmetics as a whole increasingly in the cross hairs of competition law are available.Other non-binding and free information around the cosmetic law, see

Warning: Firms Apply For Money Payments

Posted by John Sommers on 4th July 2014 in General

modified cease and desist (MOD.UE) who received a warning for violation of copyright law in the Internet, goes into the Internet often only a modified Declaration of discontinuance (MOD.To dispose of UE). In many forums, it is important to read that the firms admonition from not to pursue the matters. This behavior is with caution. The number of cases in which the (alleged) claims are pursued, rises steadily. This year money payments on behalf of their clients have been applied for in particular by the law firms of Salado & Schenk, Waldorf of Frommer, Fareds, U + C, .rka and Zimmermann Decker.

A notice of alleged copyright infringement was regularly preceded by these orders. This shows even more clearly that to always back court enforced the claims asserted in the cease and desist letters. What is a judicial order for payment? The order for payment procedure (officially legal Dunning proceedings) is a court procedure, the simplified enforcement of Debt is used. This allows enforcement of a debt without complaint, without judgment. The procedure is performed often fully automated, without that verifies whether the payment actually entitled to the applicant.

This note is also on the order for payment itself. The procedure is so that a quick and cost-saving alternative to the ordinary civil procedure, which is especially suitable for claims, allowing no hassle. The aim of the procedure is first to move a debtor to pay. However, the writ of execution is at the end of the order for payment procedure. This is an enforcement order, with which the creditor can enforce his debt. How should I react to the order for payment? Notes of the Court are located on the back of the payment order. You should first of all read this alone. In case of doubt, whether the claim is actually should be responded as soon as possible: doubts remain, so it can recommend themselves immediately with a lawyer, a lawyer or person authorised with an otherwise to the legal advice center or service to use. First, be aware that remain for the gathering of the opposition just two weeks from the notification of the payment order. If you want to proceed against the order, then they should let not uneventful this period. You should opposition anyway within this period. Only after the timely collection of the opposition, the matter is emitted to the competent court. This will inform you however also separately. If affiliated by the opposite side is brought a lawyer should be contacted in any case. Her Tobias Arnold do you get also a Dunning? Please note the deadline there. We are also under available.


© 2008-2018 Najri All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright